[PD] is this a spectral gate?

[Kevin McCoy]

osc~'s right inlet only takes data, if I'm correct.

k

On 2/21/07, Chris McCormick <chris at mccormick.cx> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 12:54:21PM +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> > This means, that resynthesizing this signal at SR=48000 would be
> > similar to using oscillators like this:
> >
> >   [osc~ 0]
> >   |
> >   [*~ 4.4602]
> >
> >   [osc~ 6000]
> >   |
> >   [*~ 1.1871]
> >
> >   [osc~ 12000]
> >   |
> >   [*~ 0.62254]
> >
> >   [osc~ 18000]
> >   |
> >   [*~ 0.47394]
> >
> >   ...
> >
> > and so on (Note that without normalizing these values are to loud.)
> >
> > However: All these oscillators would also need to have their phases
> > set accordingly, so you cannot just use above oscillator bank directly
> > in real life.
>
> Can't you use [osc~]'s right inlet to accomplish that?
>
> Anyway, I've always seen spectral modifiers that work on the amplitude
> data only. What happens if you work on the phase data only? I mean, what
> does it sound like? I guess I should just try it.
>
> Best,
>
> Chris.
>
> -------------------
> chris at mccormick.cx
> http://mccormick.cx
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>


-- 


++++
http://pocketkm.blogspot.com