moritz wrote: > hello > > i could not find how to give gemhead a lower rate, right now it gives 20 > "gem_state" per second, i only need 12 per second. > i think i can save cpu with that, or am i wrong? > > thanx > > > moritz > ooups, i just find out, that the frame argument for [gemwin] sets the speed for [gemhead] too. sorry for my spam moritz