[PD] [dsplib]: how should it be maintained?

[Kyle Klipowicz]

I am curious, has anyone ever vandalized the netpd patches during a jam?

~Kyle

On 6/19/07, Roman Haefeli <reduzierer at yahoo.de> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 19:33 +0200, Steffen wrote:
>
> > The "x.x.x"-system might be nice. How do you use it? Keep the first
> > x=0 at all times as no code gets to version 1; bumb the second x when
> > new features are added; bumb the last x when bugs are corrected? -
>
> yo, that is how i use them. but the main reason, why netpd uses it, is a
> purely technical one:
> patches and abstractions are shared between netpd clients. in order to
> make sure, that changes made to a patch or abstraction get to the other
> netpd clients as well, this versioning system was introduced. when
> loading a patch with creator, the version is checked by creator and
> compared with the version of the same patch on the other clients. if the
> patch to be opened has a higher version number than the on the other
> clients, the patch is uploaded instead of only opened, so that the patch
> on the other clients is overwritten.
>
> > Such info one how the version numbers makes sense is nice to add in a
> > README, i think.
>
> hm, since - as frank stated - a version number is not essential, i'd
> say, it wouldn't do it into the readme.
>
> roman
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>


-- 
-----
------------
    ----     -----
---- -------- - ------
http://perhapsidid.wordpress.com