[PD] Bug in lister (zexy) ?
IOhannes m zmoelnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Tue Oct 2 09:39:57 CEST 2007
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> - [list append] is _not_ exactly the same as [lister]. you can make a
> [lister] (or [l]) _abstraction_ with built-in objects:
> | |
> [route bang] |
> | | |
> | [t b a] |
> +----------+ | |
> | +--+
> [list append ]
> - afaik, this patchlet is 100% compatible, if you feed all the arguments
> of [lister] to the [list append] replacement.
> - this patchlet cannot be made into a 100% compatible _abstraction_ with
what i mean is: you can replace [l] with the above code. but you cannot
simply make an abstraction [l] containing the above code and expect it
to behave identically.
More information about the Pd-list