[PD] That's a surprising new look

Andy Farnell padawan12 at obiwannabe.co.uk
Wed Oct 10 15:58:18 CEST 2007

I'm a bit torn on this. I actually like the concept, but you're right,
like all good things that make life easy they tend to erode discipline
and structure. The patch messy and sweep it all under the rug 
philosophy is probably very appealing to many.

On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 21:27:47 -0400
"Kevin McCoy" <km.takewithyou at gmail.com> wrote:

> > The Pd graph-on-parent makes more sense IMHO because it uses existing Pd
> > mechanisms for encapsulation and encourages patchers to modularize their
> > programs.
> >
> 100% agreed, that is why I thought "umm... what's so special about this
> presentation mode?" when I saw that page.  To me that should be planned into
> the program.  If your patches are messy for performance, code cleaner, use
> subpatches, etc, no excuses for that as far as I see.  Sends and receives
> for gui objects have been there since I started..  I guess I wasn't really
> excited about any of that stuff :) but then again maybe I misunderstand..
> km

Use the source

More information about the Pd-list mailing list