[PD] pdpedia classifications
IOhannes m zmoelnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Wed Oct 17 18:39:18 CEST 2007
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> On Oct 17, 2007, at 8:58 AM, Nicolas Montgermont wrote:
> Yeah, that's the idea of the status field. Perhaps when something is
> marked deprecated, it should include the date and last Pd version of
> the deprecation.
hmm, is an external that works fine with pd-0.33 "deprecated"?
just because pd-0.33 might be considered "deprecated"? after all pd-0.33
is still available.
in this case, pd-0.39 might be deprecated as well (even though the
current pd-exteded is based on that). are all externals that work only
with the latest release of pd-extended (but not with 0.40 or 0.41 (once
this gets out)) to be deprecated then?
i would rather have a more positive field "works with:" (last known
pd-version to work with)
how about the other way round? "requires:" (pd>0.30)
what with externals that change with Pd?
(v1.0 works with pd-0.37..0.39; v2.0 works with 0.40..)
More information about the Pd-list