No subject

NOT have an identifier following it? I think it would be very helpful if we
use identifiers in the SQL if only to make the binding to the proper
datatypes easier, as per my last email.


Mike
--=20
Peace may sound simple=97one beautiful word=97 but it requires everything w=
e
have, every quality, every strength, every dream, every high ideal.
=97Yehudi Menuhin (1916=961999), musician

------=_Part_6074_16143776.1197314399120
Content-Type: text/html; charset=WINDOWS-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

<br><br><div><span class=3D"gmail_quote">On 12/10/07, <b class=3D"gmail_sen=
dername">Jamie Bullock</b> &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:jamie at postlude.co.uk">jami=
e at postlude.co.uk</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" sty=
le=3D"margin:0;margin-left:0.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1e=
x">
PREPARE uses the &#39;$&#39; character as its placeholder identifier, and &=
#39;$1&#39;</blockquote><div><br class=3D"webkit-block-placeholder"></div><=
div>Jamie, after thinking about this, I don&#39;t think we should worry abo=
ut the specifics of the characters that we use, as long as we can agree on =
what gets entered into a PD message box, the specific instance of the exter=
nal (&#39;sqlite&#39;, &#39;psql&#39;, etc.) can handle the conversion to w=
hat the specific database uses.
</div><div><br class=3D"webkit-block-placeholder"></div><div>From what I ha=
ve seen on this thread, is it right that the &#39;?&#39; syntax does NOT ha=
ve an&nbsp;identifier&nbsp;following it? I think it would be very helpful i=
f we use identifiers in the SQL if only to make the binding to the proper d=
atatypes easier, as per my last email.
</div><div><br>&nbsp;</div></div>Mike<div><br>-- <br>Peace may sound simple=
=97one beautiful word=97 but it requires everything we have, every quality,=
 every strength, every dream, every high ideal.<br>=97Yehudi Menuhin (1916=
=961999), musician
</div>

------=_Part_6074_16143776.1197314399120--