[PD] SSSAD vs MEMENTO

[Miller Puckette]

I'm still thinking about it.  On the plus side, it would make Pd users'
lives easier; on the minus, it would introduce a new library dependence and
thus reduce Pd's portability.

The OSC design is not much better than that of MIDI, in my opinion...
it's a pity it's so widely adopted.

cheers
Miller

On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 12:20:43PM -0600, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
> Ahaha I KNEW it!
> 
> Well, did Miller ever weigh in on this?
> 
> ~Kyle
> 
> On Jan 5, 2008 9:30 AM, Chris McCormick <chris at mccormick.cx> wrote:
> > > On Jan 4, 2008 10:23 PM, Chris McCormick <chris at mccormick.cx> wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 04:26:56PM +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> > > > > There will be no direct support for OSC in [sssad] unless Miller
> > > > > decides to include some OSCroute-variant in plain Pd, as sssad will
> > > > > never require externals.
> > > >
> > > > Has anyone lobbied Miller for this feature?
> > > > <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2005-11/033012.html> but
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 01:08:24AM -0600, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
> > > Wait, isn't OSC GNU? Deja vu for some reason...
> >
> > Read the thread.
> >
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Chris.
> >
> >
> > -------------------
> > http://mccormick.cx
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> -----
> ------------
>     ----     -----
> ---- -------- - ------
> http://perhapsidid.wordpress.com
> http://myspace.com/kyleklipowicz
> 
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list