[PD] vline~ question

[Frank Barknecht]

Hallo,
IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:

> however, i would say that the 3rd digit is more or less useless (only 
> there for convenience) because you can get the same behaviour with 
> scheduled messages.
> e.g.
> [0, 1 1000 500(
> |
> [vline~]
> 
> is the same as
> 
> [t b b]
> |     |
> [0(   [del 500]
> |     |
> |     [1 1000(
> +-----+
> |
> [vline~]

Note that the former version is *muchmuch* more convenient, especially
when building line segments dynamically.

Ciao
-- 
 Frank Barknecht                                     _ ______footils.org__