[PD] bang~ <=64 samples
Miller Puckette
mpuckett at imusic1.ucsd.edu
Sun Mar 16 03:50:54 CET 2008
Bang~ goes off at 64-sample intervals (1.45 msec) - but for instance
a 0.725 msec delay would sync a message to 32 sample into a 64 sample
buffer. Of course you might need objects that can deal with messages on
such a fine time grain. Tne only one I know of is vline~ (which is the
one I use for this kind of thing.)
cheers
M
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 10:45:05PM -0400, marius schebella wrote:
> hi miller,
> not exaclty sure what sub-64-sample message delays means?
> block~ 64 64? or 64 delays each 0.0226757369615 ms.
> will test this.
> marius.
>
> Miller Puckette wrote:
> > You can do it combining bang~ with sub-64-sample message delays.
> >
> > cheers
> > M
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 10:05:46PM -0400, marius schebella wrote:
> >> hi,
> >> is there an alternative for bang~ that will work with blocksizes smaller
> >> than 64 samples?
> >> or is there a chance to fix bang~?
> >> marius.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list