[PD] delread~ [was: Re: declare]
fbar at footils.org
Tue Apr 1 08:50:26 CEST 2008
marius schebella hat gesagt: // marius schebella wrote:
> it was just an idea... that way you will not have the problem of the one
> block delay of delread~.
First: If you sort the delread~ before the delwrite~ you will always
have one block of delay.
But anyway: Automatic sorting of delread/delwrite doesn't solve the
problem you talk about: For feedback delays you want to have the
delread before the delwrite, for non-feedback delay lines you want to
the delwrite before the delread.
Again, please read the delay chapter in Miller's book for a detailed
> Frank Barknecht wrote:
> > Hallo,
> > marius schebella hat gesagt: // marius schebella wrote:
> >> [[btw. can't we use that method to have all delread~
> >> saved and loaded at the beginning of a patch?]]
> > Why t.h. would you want that?!?
> > Ciao
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__
More information about the Pd-list