[PD] libraries

chris clepper cgclepper at gmail.com
Mon Apr 7 21:19:28 CEST 2008


You need x86 versions of your libraries.  0.38.4 probably ran entirely under
Rosetta emulation while 0.39 is Intel native.  Downloading full pd-extended
for OSX Intel should get the right set.

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Ben Carney <bfcarney at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello there all
> Can anyone explain to me why libraries load so much better for me in the
> 0.38.4 version of extended compared to 0.39.?
>
> All of my libraries load in the previous version, but in the new version,
> I get this.
>
> /Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/Resources/Scripts/../extra/fftease.pd_darwin:
> dlopen(/Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/Resources/Scripts/../extra/fftease.pd_darwin,
> 10): no suitable image found.  Did find:
>  /Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/Resources/Scripts/../extra/fftease.pd_darwin:
> mach-o, but wrong architecture
> fftease: can't load library
> iemabs: can't load library
> iemmatrix: can't load library
> liblist: can't load library
> PDP: pure data packet version 0.12.5-darcs
> PiDiP : additional video processing objects for PDP : version 0.12.20 (
> ydegoyon at free.fr )
>
>  I have tried alot of different methods of recognizing libraries to no
> avail.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Ben C.
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20080407/403c0ad4/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list