[PD] import vs namespace
derek at umatic.nl
Tue Apr 8 17:37:20 CEST 2008
But this way doesn't load abstractions and help patches, AFAIK.
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> This is only the case on 0.40 and newer. [import] on 0.39 loads into
> the global namespace. This stuff is currently alpha and not complete,
> so it is not very clear. I think for the manual, the best bet for
> Pd-extended is to use the [library/objectclass] format for
> objectclasses that aren't loaded by default. That has been supported by
> every version of Pd for a long time now (as long as you install the
> libraries that way).
> On Apr 8, 2008, at 9:22 AM, marius schebella wrote:
>> as far as I understood [import] is the same as [declare -lib] and that
>> only adds a library to the local namespace of a patch. see the help file
>> for declare that comes with 0.41.
>> you can declare your library relative to pd [declare -stdlib] or
>> relative to the patch [declare -lib], but - as mentioned in the helpfile
>> - the name stdpath is confusing!].
>> it is also not 100% clear, how this works in abstractions and if the
>> behaviour will be consistent with future pd versions.
>> there might be a chance that [import] really adds to the global
>> namespace, but I don't think so. (otoh I don't know how to add something
>> to the global namespace.)
>> the idea was that you can use a certain objectclass in one patch and
>> another one with the same name (but from another lib) in another patch.
>> please correct me, if I'm wrong.
>> Derek Holzer wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> it seems that the ways of dealing with externals and paths is always in
>>> flux! I would like to confirm a suspicion that, for the time being, the
>>> following works the way I think it does, assuming PD 0.39:
>>> [library/object] imports that specific object into global namespace, and
>>> can accommodate different objects with the same name from different
>>> libs. This method does not allow access to help patches or abstractions
>>> in the library path.
>>> [import library] imports the whole library into global namespace,
>>> including help patches and other abs (usually, although I have often
>>> found this broken in Extended). It cannot accommodate different objects
>>> with the same name from different libs, as the last library imported
>>> will have priority.
>>> Is this correct so far? Has anyone documented this any more
>>> substantially anywhere? How does this change for 0.40?
>> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> Computer science is no more related to the computer than astronomy is
> related to the telescope. -Edsger Dykstra
derek holzer ::: http://www.umatic.nl ::: http://blog.myspace.com/macumbista
---Oblique Strategy # 39:
"Cut a vital connection"
More information about the Pd-list