[PD] Cyclone in vanilla?
padawan12 at obiwannabe.co.uk
Mon Apr 21 21:55:19 CEST 2008
Yes. Please don't take this the wrong way Derek, I sincerely appreciate
Everything can be done with [expr~], so why don't we just rename Pd
to [expr~]? :)
Seriously, raising one number to a power is an essential, fundamental operation
Is there any plausible excuse for its omission from core Pd?
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008 20:53:00 +0200
Derek Holzer <derek at umatic.nl> wrote:
> Can the job be done with [expr~]?
> Andy Farnell wrote:
> > Did I read that Cyclone is to be incorporated into vanilla Pd?
> > Having discovered too late that [pow~] is not part of vanilla
> > I am about to remove the constraint of using vanilla Pd for
> > the synthetic sound design book since it is incomplete without
> > basic mathematical operators.
> > andy
> derek holzer ::: http://www.umatic.nl ::: http://blog.myspace.com/macumbista
> ---Oblique Strategy # 190:
> "You can only make one dot at a time"
Use the source
More information about the Pd-list