[PD] Cyclone in vanilla?

Miller Puckette mpuckett at imusic1.ucsd.edu
Wed Apr 23 22:17:40 CEST 2008


I believe z~ is just rzero~ 0.

cheers
Miller

On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 11:24:34AM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hallo,
> Matt Barber hat gesagt: // Matt Barber wrote:
> 
> > Actually, for those of us who insist on vanilla and do everything with
> > expr/expr~/fexpr~ or abstractions, is it possible to implement [z~] in
> > fexpr~ for a delay larger than its vector size?  You could do it with
> > an abstraction using [delwrite~] and [delread~], setting the [block~]
> > to 1, and then set the delay as a ratio to the [samplerate~] -- the
> > difficulty in making it work correctly here is setting the size of the
> > [delwrite~] efficiently (this could maybe be done with a loadbang
> > routine that would send a message to a subpatch in the abstraction
> > instance to add and connect a delwrite~ with the proper delay
> > allocation...).
> 
> You don't need to set the block~-size to 1, and personally I would
> just make the delwrite~ "big enough". It's cheap to store things in a
> delay. But anyway, attached is a z~-clone with delwrite~/delread~ that
> uses a helper abstraction created dynamically.
> 
> Ciao
> -- 
>  Frank Barknecht                                     _ ______footils.org__




> _______________________________________________
> PD-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list





More information about the Pd-list mailing list