[PD] Cyclone in vanilla?

Andy Farnell padawan12 at obiwannabe.co.uk
Thu Apr 24 18:16:08 CEST 2008

Yep. What is to be done about that? Should we keep
to the conventions of vanilla and Pd generally by
changing that? 

I am torn on this. I would have a lot of rewriting to do
but would like to see conventions observed.

OTOH, maybe compatibility with patches out there using Cyclone
[pow~] should be respected as a priority.

BTW it's very important for to know. If it changes after I
publish the book I will hire a bounty hunter to bring me
the fingers of whoever made the changes :)

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 11:39:07 -0400
marius schebella <marius.schebella at gmail.com> wrote:

> btw, are all pow~ objects reversed? right inlet^left inlet?
> marius.
> Andy Farnell wrote:
> > Did I read that Cyclone is to be incorporated into vanilla Pd?
> > 
> > Having discovered too late that [pow~] is not part of vanilla
> > I am about to remove the constraint of using vanilla Pd for 
> > the synthetic sound design book since it is incomplete without
> > basic mathematical  operators.
> > 
> > andy
> > 

Use the source

More information about the Pd-list mailing list