[PD] Cyclone in vanilla?
padawan12 at obiwannabe.co.uk
Thu Apr 24 18:16:08 CEST 2008
Yep. What is to be done about that? Should we keep
to the conventions of vanilla and Pd generally by
I am torn on this. I would have a lot of rewriting to do
but would like to see conventions observed.
OTOH, maybe compatibility with patches out there using Cyclone
[pow~] should be respected as a priority.
BTW it's very important for to know. If it changes after I
publish the book I will hire a bounty hunter to bring me
the fingers of whoever made the changes :)
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 11:39:07 -0400
marius schebella <marius.schebella at gmail.com> wrote:
> btw, are all pow~ objects reversed? right inlet^left inlet?
> Andy Farnell wrote:
> > Did I read that Cyclone is to be incorporated into vanilla Pd?
> > Having discovered too late that [pow~] is not part of vanilla
> > I am about to remove the constraint of using vanilla Pd for
> > the synthetic sound design book since it is incomplete without
> > basic mathematical operators.
> > andy
Use the source
More information about the Pd-list