[PD] Cyclone in vanilla?
jamie at postlude.co.uk
Fri Apr 25 08:56:37 CEST 2008
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 17:23 +0200, Thomas Grill wrote:
> Me for one, i have really missed pow~ or abs~ but i have been missing
> many other things.
> I don't see the necessity for the objects you mentioned when they can
> be built as abstractions using expr~ within seconds.
But isn't expr~ an external? I don't see using expr~ as a 'vanilla pd'
solution to this problem.
More information about the Pd-list