[PD] Cyclone in vanilla?

[Jamie Bullock]

On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 17:23 +0200, Thomas Grill wrote:

> Me for one, i have really missed pow~ or abs~ but i have been missing  
> many other things.
> I don't see the necessity for the objects you mentioned when they can  
> be built as abstractions using expr~ within seconds.

But isn't expr~ an external? I don't see using expr~ as a 'vanilla pd'
solution to this problem.

Jamie

-- 
www.postlude.co.uk