[PD] better tabread4~

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

On Jun 23, 2008, at 7:52 AM, Andy Farnell wrote:

> On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:50:44 -0400 (EDT)
> Mathieu Bouchard <matju at artengine.ca> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Andy Farnell wrote:
>>
>>> with [tabread4~] being good enough for playing back files at
>>> their original rate,
>>
>> If you are going to playback at original rate, [tabread4] is both  
>> useless
>> and 10 times slower than [tabread]. All that [tabread4] is good  
>> at, is
>> playing back at different non-original rates (that is anything  
>> else than
>> +1 times and -1 times).
>>
>>   _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
>> | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal, Québec
>
>
> Yes that'right, hmm I guess I knew that but said it in a woolly way
>
> Amend that to
>
> [tabread~] - "play back at exactly" the original rate
> [tabread4~] - "play back at close to the orginal rate"
> [tabread4c~] - "play back with wider transposition"

>

Perhaps these could have more descriptive names, especially if there  
was a "tabread", etc. library.  Some quick ideas:

[tabread_tweak~]
[tabread_transpose~]

.hc



>
> -- 
> Use the source
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ 
> listinfo/pd-list




------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
----

                             kill your television