[PD] GEM pix_buffer question
IOhannes m zmoelnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Tue Jun 24 11:25:31 CEST 2008
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> My guess is because pix_buffer stores uncompressed frames, which are
> much bigger. But I could be wrong.
you could store the pixes in YUV-format, which will double the amount of
images you can store in a given memory (the default is RGBA)
(either send the [colorspace YUV( to the [pix_film] or use [pix_yuv]
just before the [pix_buffer_write])
if you think that the bottleneck is the harddisk access, you could also
try to read the film from a RAM-disk (if such a thing exists on w32)
fgmasdr
IOhannes
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list