[PD] pdlua also into vanilla?
Hans-Christoph Steiner
hans at eds.org
Sun Jul 20 19:16:38 CEST 2008
On Jul 19, 2008, at 10:40 AM, marius schebella wrote:
> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>> As a test yes, but not for the release. It's changing too fast
>> right now to maintain backwards compatibility, so including it
>> would cause more problems than it would solve.
>
> I am not sure, if it really changes, or if it only adds new
> features. I think the big problems (file naming, loader) are
> solved, but not sure.
> I worked a lot with py/pyext and pdj in the past (which are also
> candidates for pdx), but pdlua is the only scripting tool that can
> easily integrate the language as a static library, because it is so
> small. maintainance should be easier than with python and java.
Adding features is also changing.
>> I just had a thought: how about replacing Tcl/Tk with Lua/Tk?
>> Just a thought...
>
> is this just a matter of replacing one with the other, or does this
> mean every graphical part has to be rewritten?
>
> marius.
It would mean rewriting pd.tk in Lua and translating the Tcl/Tk code
in the C files into Lua/Tk.
.hc
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
There is no way to peace, peace is the way. -A.J. Muste
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list