[PD] dumpOSC problems "couldn't create"

Claude Heiland-Allen claudiusmaximus at goto10.org
Sun Jul 20 12:34:53 CEST 2008


Jack wrote:
> Le 19 juil. 08 à 17:25, zmoelnig at iem.at a écrit :
> 
>> Quoting Claude Heiland-Allen <claudiusmaximus at goto10.org>:
>>
>>> [dumpOSC 5555] needs to be able to bind to network port 5555, if
>>> something else is already using it (or if the previous user of the  
>>> port
>>> hasn't timed out completely) then dumpOSC will fail to create.
>> which btw, is by design and not a bug.
>> it is the very same behaviour as the [netreceive] object has.
> This is a real problem with [netreceive]. For example when Pd crash,  
> if you open your last patch, Pd can't create your [netreceive] with  
> the same port. Is it possible to force to close connection on this  
> port to solve the problem ?
> ++

http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2007-06/050710.html

> 
> Jack
> 
> 
>> and before i forget it: have i already said that i would advice
>> everybody to _not_ use [dumpOSC] (as part of the OSCx library) and
>> instead use mrpeach's [udpreceive] and [unpackOSC]?
>>
>> fadrm
>> IOhannes
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ 
>> listinfo/pd-list
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list





More information about the Pd-list mailing list