[PD] Disabling a [gemhead] by default (Re: Writing texture to different sides of cube in GEM)

Jack jack at rybn.org
Mon Aug 25 19:35:17 CEST 2008


OK, thank you for the precisions.
++

Jack


Le 25 août 08 à 19:32, cyrille henry a écrit :

>
>
> Jack a écrit :
>> We are talking about [gemlist].
>> Is there a difference with [any] ?
> "gemlist" is a gem object, that work only with gem data
>
> "any" is an (iem) external that work with any data.
>
> you can replace "gemlist" with "any" in your patch, but gemlist  
> should work without any dependency (except Gem of course)
>
>
> cyrille
>
>> Thanx.
>> ++
>> Jack
>> Le 25 août 08 à 18:51, Frank Barknecht a écrit :
>>> Hallo,
>>> Frank Barknecht hat gesagt: // Frank Barknecht wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hallo,
>>>> cyrille henry hat gesagt: // cyrille henry wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> the best would be not to use the double gemhead trick, but the   
>>>>> "repeat" (or
>>>>> until) trick instead : it's faster, and don't have this  
>>>>> problem,  so i think
>>>>> it's easier to understand.
>>>> Yes: Everyone is on the latest Gem should use gemlist instead  
>>>> of  the old
>>>> double gemhead approach.
>>> oh, and of course if people have been usign some abstraction like  
>>> the
>>> dgemhead, it's easy to update it to use [gemlist], if that's   
>>> available.
>>>
>>> Ciao
>>> -- 
>>> Frank
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/  
>>> listinfo/pd-list
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ 
>> listinfo/pd-list





More information about the Pd-list mailing list