[PD] [PD-announce] Gem 0.91-2 bugfix release

[IOhannes m zmoelnig]

Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> 
> 
> Yeah, you need to compile on 10.4 to make it 10.4 compatible.  It should 
> also be possible to use -isysroot to compile for 10.4 on 10.5 if you 
> want to try that.

the isysroot seems to work ok so far.

> 
> About .d_fat, I think it is probably best to avoid that.  .pd_darwin 
> works well with fat/universal binaries and will cause much less 
> confusion.  I don't think .d_fat been used anywhere except for 4 
> objectclasses in extra.  I have been using .pd_darwin universal 
> binaries, and Thomas Grill has as well.

do i understand correctly, that there is no real argument against d_fat 
in the above?

btw, most universal binaries maintained by thomas musil are d_fat.

fgmadr
IOhannes
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3636 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20090121/59d79c56/attachment.bin>