[PD] limit in number of sssad abstraction

[punchik punchik]

Hi Frank i was using sssad 0.1 , i updated to the last version from svn and now it works fine without crashes, but im still getting those stack overflow messages, Is there anyway to know where  does they come from in pd? how can i know what is causing this?

I was thinking maybe is because im printing all mesages from each sssad at the same time, do you think this can causes this?
Other thing i was thinking is that sometimes im using one saddd abstraction for hold 3 variables as in the case of "colorglobal_background: 1 0 0.305085"  Is this a good practice ? or is it better to use one sssad object for each variable?


thanksss
pun.

here is an example of what im getting:


presetcolortexto: 1
colortextoonofftres: 0
colortextoonoffdos: 1
colortextoonoff: 1
colortextouno: 864.567
iteraciontres: 21
iteraciondos: 20
iteracionuno: 12
colorglobal_background: 1 0 0.305085
coloruno: 0 0 1
colortres: 0.661017 0 1
colordos: 0 0.118644 0.118644
translateuno: 3 3 15
error: stack overflow
error: stack overflow
error: stack overflow
error: stack overflow
error: stack overflow
error: stack overflow
error: stack overflow
error: stack overflow
error: stack overflow
error: stack overflow
error: stack overflow
error: stack overflow
error: stack overflow
error: stack overflow
error: stack overflow
error: stack overflow
error: stack overflow
error: stack overflow
error: stack overflow
error: stack overflow
error: stack overflow
error: stack overflow
error: stack overflow
error: stack overflow
error: stack overflow
error: stack overflow
error: stack overflow
error: stack overflow
error: stack overflow
rotateglobal: -5 138 0
translateglobal: 0 0 -5
translateuno_uno: 10 -11 -16
rotateuno: -12 -70 -72
translatetres_uno: -107 -29 -116
translatetres: -19 51 10
rotatedos_uno: 0 116 0
translatedos_uno: -265 -104 70
rotatedos: 11 -24 0
translatedos: 40 0 0

--- On Sun, 2/8/09, Frank Barknecht <fbar at footils.org> wrote:

> From: Frank Barknecht <fbar at footils.org>
> Subject: Re: [PD] limit in number of sssad abstraction
> To: pd-list at iem.at
> Date: Sunday, February 8, 2009, 6:53 AM
> Hallo Pun,
> 
> I really cannot make that patch crash. Maybe you are
> using some old version of sssad or there is an
> imcompatibility with
> sssad and Pd-extended (which I don't use). Anyway I
> patched a little
> test patch in the attachement that you just tests saving
> and loading
> of many sssad-presets. Can you try this? I can manage many
> abstractions without crashes.
> 
> Ciao
> -- 
> Frnak
> 
> punchik punchik hat gesagt: // punchik punchik wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Hi Frank, i discovered that the problem is not
> something specific in my patch , it also happenes in your
> sssad-example's patch: if you first load a preset and
> then you try to save another one it always crashes. So if
> you first save a preset and then load it , it works fine,
> but if you want to save a new preset without closing and
> reopening pd, it crashes, any idea of how to fix this?
> > 
> > thanks
> > 
> > Pun.
> > 
> > --- On Sat, 2/7/09, Frank Barknecht
> <fbar at footils.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > From: Frank Barknecht <fbar at footils.org>
> > > Subject: Re: [PD] limit in number of sssad
> abstraction
> > > To: pd-list at iem.at
> > > Date: Saturday, February 7, 2009, 8:40 AM
> > > Hallo,
> > > punchik punchik hat gesagt: // punchik punchik
> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > hello list, is there is a limit in the
> number of sssad
> > > abstractions that can be used in a patch, im
> using 50 sssad
> > > abstractions in a patch and when i save  to a
> text file my
> > > pd crashes(but it still save fine the file), and
> then when i
> > > try to load the textfile- preset it loads fine
> but i get
> > > stack overflow messages, when my patch had 20
> sssad
> > > abstractions it used to work fine.
> > > > 
> > > > why is that? Is the problem the number of
> sssad
> > > abstractions im using?
> > > 
> > > Could you send an example patch that demonstrates
> the
> > > problem? Generally
> > > using 50 sssad's should be fine. For example
> the s_fm4
> > > from the RjDj
> > > library uses 40 sssad's in one object without
> problems
> > > - and I usually
> > > use more sssad-enabled objects in paralell to
> that.
> > > 
> > > Ciao
> > > -- 
> > > Frank
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> > > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> > > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> > 
> > 
> >       
> > 
> 
> -- 
>  Frank Barknecht            Do You RjDj.me?          _
> ______footils.org__
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list