[PD] GEM pix_write bugs (timelapse)

[Max]

Am 01.04.2009 um 16:45 schrieb IOhannes m zmoelnig:
>
> despite of my sarcasm: have you considered using [pix_buffer] rather  
> than [pix_multiimage]; it is way more flexible.
> (e.g. if all the images can fit into ram, you don't even need a  
> harddisk)

thanks for the hint, i'll try it out.

m.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20090402/9b81caeb/attachment.pgp>