[PD] GEM + processor

chris clepper cgclepper at gmail.com
Thu Jun 11 15:15:10 CEST 2009


What size are the images?

pix_kaleidoscope isn't the most CPU friendly object either.  It does a lot
of memory operations that CPUs just aren't good at.

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Ricardo Brazileiro
<rbrazileiro at gmail.com>wrote:

> re all,
>
> i'm building a patch pd with Gem which load images and transform them using
> [pix_kaleidoscope] and [rotate].
>
> when i started the patch, the processor is overloaded, 90% 99% CPU process.
>
> exist an especific object for improve performance? In pdp has pdp_thread...
>
> the patch is attached.
>
> tkz,
>
> --
> Ricardo Brazileiro
> ^ ~ http://rbrazileiro.info
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20090611/52b675cf/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list