[PD] GEM + processor

[Jack]

Here, it should be better ;)
++

Jack



Le 11 juin 09 à 15:19, Jack a écrit :

> It seems that i have made a mistake in my patch, i come back on it.
> ++
>
> Jack
>
>
> Le 11 juin 09 à 15:06, Jack a écrit :
>
>> Do you have an alpha channel in your pictures ?
>> If not, you needn't [alpha] here.
>> If you have 90-99 % process from your CPU, (maybe) because you try  
>> to load your pictures with [pix_image].
>> What is your configuration ?
>> For a best presentation, use this patch.
>> ++
>>
>> Jack
>>
>> <kal.pd>
>>
>> Le 11 juin 09 à 14:21, Ricardo Brazileiro a écrit :
>>
>>> re all,
>>>
>>> i'm building a patch pd with Gem which load images and transform  
>>> them using [pix_kaleidoscope] and [rotate].
>>>
>>> when i started the patch, the processor is overloaded, 90% 99%  
>>> CPU process.
>>>
>>> exist an especific object for improve performance? In pdp has  
>>> pdp_thread...
>>>
>>> the patch is attached.
>>>
>>> tkz,
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Ricardo Brazileiro
>>> ^ ~ http://rbrazileiro.info
>>>
>>>
>>> <gem_test.pd>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ 
>>> listinfo/pd-list
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ 
>> listinfo/pd-list
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20090611/1e4798c3/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: kal.pd
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1385 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20090611/1e4798c3/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20090611/1e4798c3/attachment-0001.htm>