[PD] is bang~ limited to a 64 sample block?

[Martin Schied]

hard off wrote:
> i wanted to send a bang on a zero-crossing
>
and then using it for...?

I made a (slow) zerocross detection as part of my current work, see 
attachment. It gives you zero crossings as 2-element lists with a leding 
"indicator" (don't know how to call it correctly) and the index of a 
table where crossings occur.

I later noticed those nice iem-tab externals which do kind of the same 
job but a lot faster than "until" but i was to busy - so it's still slow.
There's also some unnecessary copying inside it because I used my 
"standard code template for table operations"

Also using >~ and <~  and z~  for the detection might be less cpu consuming.


cheers,
Martin




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: array_zerocross.pd
Type: application/puredata
Size: 2473 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20090620/1fe4cb01/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: array_zerocross-help.pd
Type: application/puredata
Size: 1288 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20090620/1fe4cb01/attachment-0001.bin>