[PD] w32-binaries on the list (was Re: uDmx object Library for Windows)

[Derek Holzer]

Yes agreed, I like having a "local copy" of the archive for those 
special times when the internet is far away. And the idea of having to 
manually rename every attachment isn't very cool either!!!!!! I see lots 
of complaints on the horizon for that. Imagine having a complicated 
patch with several abstractions that must be sorted and properly named 
in order for it to work.

D.

Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hallo,
> IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> 
>> but then i really think it is not such a bad idea to enable this feature.
>> any other opinions?
> 
> Hm, would this mean that we would not get any attachements sent anymore, just
> links?  That I wouldn't really like, as it make my personal list-archive depend
> on pd.info, which is not available everywhere I go.
> 
> Ciao

-- 
::: derek holzer ::: http://blog.myspace.com/macumbista ::: 
http://www.vimeo.com/macumbista :::
---Oblique Strategy # 99:
"Is there something missing?"