[PD] iemnet (was Re: question about netclient and netserver)

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

On Mar 25, 2010, at 4:26 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:

> On 2010-03-24 17:08, martin.peach at sympatico.ca wrote:
>>
>> zmoelnig wrote:
>>
>>> PS:
>>> for what it is worth: i have forked mrpeach/net yesterday, with  
>>> the aim
>>
>>
>> If you're going to do that, I think you should change their names,  
>> otherwise confusion will reign.
>
> the names are just perfect :-)

Perhaps, but they are also taken.  I think its bad form to reuse the  
name if you plan on maintaining them as separate objects.  That's  
certainly one topic we've discussed to death back in the day.  If its  
a dev branch, then no, but that should then be a branch in SVN.

.hc

> on the long run, i hope to make them compatible with your original
> objects. at the same time i don't mind at all if improvements are
> backported.
> for now a fork just seemed the best way to allow more rapid  
> development
> without having to think about legacy issues.
>
> for now things look rather promising:
> a [tcpserver] that merely reflects incoming data back to a client
> (currently a "netcat" instance) over a realy wire took about 1.4min to
> reflect 500MB of data, whereas the original objects took about 53.5min
> (no manual tuning with buffer sizes in any test)
>
> fmadrs
> IOhannes
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list




----------------------------------------------------------------------------

I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as my  
telephone; my wish has come true because I can no longer figure out  
how to use my telephone."  --Bjarne Stroustrup (creator of C++)