[PD] pd~ and DIO errors

[tim vets]

2010/4/3 tim vets <timvets at gmail.com>

> Hi Patrick,
>
> 2010/4/3 patrick <puredata at 11h11.com>
>
> hi tim,
>>
>> just to be sure, do you use the -rt flag when starting pd? also, try to
>> run everything (jack, pd) in root (just to see if the glitches is the cause
>> of a limitation).
>>
>>
> Yes, I start pd with "pd -rt -jack"
> I tried your suggestion, running pd as root, but got no better results.
> Some parts in the patch contain several [sigmund~] and [bonk~] objects,
> which seem quite heavy, so I'd like to put those in a separate pd process,
> to make use of the other processors on the machine...
> I even get DIO errors when I load my abstraction in a pd~ object and don't
> switch~ it on, whereas when loading it as a regular abstraction, switch~-ing
> it off stops the DIO errors.
> Thanks,
> Tim
>
>
>
>
> pat
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20100403/3a4f9e0f/attachment.htm>