[PD] overriding objects

[Mathieu Bouchard]

On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

> This namesystem needs not be any more complex than the namesystem of pd 
> object classes. No-one is naming stuff like [at.iem.iemmatrix.mtx_*] nor 
> [at/iem/iemmatrix/mtx_*] so I don't know why you would try to make it 
> different for an atom-type registry. It doesn't need that disease. If 
> you make it look like such namespacing is the way to go.

erratum : didn't finish this sentence. If you make it look like such 
namespacing is the way to go, it makes the whole concept of the atom type 
registry look more complicated than it really is... even if it's just 
symbols or parts of symbols.

  _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard, Montréal, Québec. téléphone: +1.514.383.3801