[PD] problem using [udpsend] from iemnet (or mrpeach) in a sub-process (with [pd~])

Max abonnements at revolwear.com
Fri Aug 20 15:10:12 CEST 2010


is the child or the parent doing the audio?

Am 20.08.2010 um 15:04 schrieb Jack:

> Sorry for the noise, it is working with [udpsend] !
> But it is still very slow.
> The best is to use GEM and MSD in the same patch.
> Is it normal the data transfers are so slow with sub-process (using
> [pd~]) ?
> Is there another method to accelerate this transfert between GEM and MSD
> using [pd~] and [stdout] ?
> Thanx.
> ++
> 
> Jack
> 
> 
> Le vendredi 20 août 2010 à 14:53 +0200, Jack a écrit :
>> Hello,
>> 
>> When i try to send data from a sub-process using [udpsend] from iemlib
>> (or mrpeach), it is impossible. The sub-process seems to block this
>> send. The sub-process is created with [pd~].
>> Is it a normal behavior ?
>> Any clue to resolve this problem ?
>> 
>> In fact, i'm trying to send back to the main patch data from MSD in a
>> sub-process to separate GEM from MSD. When i only use [pd~] and
>> [stdout], it works but it is very slow, that's why i'm trying now with
>> [udpsend] without [stdout] hoping to gain speed.
>> Thanx.
>> ++
>> 
>> Jack
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20100820/ba0cbefb/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list