[PD] problem using [udpsend] from iemnet (or mrpeach) in a sub-process (with [pd~])

[Jack]

Le vendredi 20 août 2010 à 11:58 -0300, Bernardo Barros a écrit :
> sorry: 44100 (or 48000 or 96000)
> 
> 2010/8/20 Bernardo Barros <bernardobarros2 at gmail.com>:
> > maybe as audio signal through JACK? That is the fastest way I'm aware.
> > That would be 441000 values per second per channel -1.0/+1.0, then you
> > had to rescale again.
Yep, i used to use JACK. But always slow here ;)
Thanx anyway.
++

Jack


> >
> > 2010/8/20 Jack <jack at rybn.org>:
> >> Hello Mathieu,
> >>
> >> I have already do that with [packOSC]/[unpackOSC] and
> >> [udpsend]/[udpreceive], it is slow too.
> >> I need to send 20000 lists of 3 floats (id, pos x, pos y) each frame (50
> >> fps) from one process to other.
> >> Thanx.
> >> ++
> >>
> >> Jack
> >>
> >>
> >> Le vendredi 20 août 2010 à 10:20 -0400, Mathieu Bouchard a écrit :
> >>> On Fri, 20 Aug 2010, Jack wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Is there another method to accelerate this transfert between GEM and MSD
> >>> > using [pd~] and [stdout] ?
> >>>
> >>> Can you try communicating with OSC instead, and see whether it's faster ?
> >>> It does lesser amounts of encoding and decoding for floats, than what
> >>> [netsend]/[netreceive]/[stdout]/[pd~] need. How many floats do you need to
> >>> send from one process to the other, per second ?
> >>>
> >>>   _ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ...
> >>> | Mathieu Bouchard, Montréal, Québec. téléphone: +1.514.383.3801
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> >> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> >>
> >