[PD] Purpose of sig~

[Mathieu Bouchard]

On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Jamie Bullock wrote:

> This is more of philosophical question than anything else.

I think of it as rather pragmatic. What does make a question philosophical 
according to you ?

> I'm curious to know why [sig~] hasn't been designed out of Pd.

But it *has* been designed out... afaik.

> Why not have implicit control -> signal conversion everywhere it is 
> possible?
> For example why not allow this?
> |2(	|3(
> |	|
> [+~ ]

This is allowed (though I haven't checked the details of what happens if 
you send that while dsp is off).

  _______________________________________________________________________
| Mathieu Bouchard ------------------------------ Villeray, Montréal, QC