[PD] Purpose of sig~
Jack
jack at rybn.org
Wed Nov 3 16:48:27 CET 2010
Le mercredi 03 novembre 2010 à 14:46 +0000, Jamie Bullock a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> This is more of philosophical question than anything else. I'm curious to know why [sig~] hasn't been designed out of Pd. Why not have implicit control -> signal conversion everywhere it is possible?
>
> For example why not allow this?
>
> |2( |3(
> | |
> [+~ ]
I think this is the same than :
[2 ( [3 (
| |
[sig~] [sig~]
\ /
\ /
[+~]
The messages are send every 64 samples (if i am right ?) So, in this
exemple, if you send it to [sig~] or [+~], this should be the same
thing.
++
Jack
>
> Jamie
>
> --
> http://www.jamiebullock.com
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list