[PD] Purpose of sig~
Jamie Bullock
jamie at postlude.co.uk
Wed Nov 3 17:32:27 CET 2010
On 3 Nov 2010, at 15:21, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Nov 2010, Jamie Bullock wrote:
>
>> This is more of philosophical question than anything else.
>
> I think of it as rather pragmatic. What does make a question philosophical according to you ?
I mean that I'm interested in the reasoning behind including certain things in Pd and leaving others out, and why certain design decisions were taken. Maybe that is pragmatic, I don't know...
>
>> I'm curious to know why [sig~] hasn't been designed out of Pd.
>
> But it *has* been designed out... afaik.
>
Ah, then I've found a bug.
If I create that graph after switching DSP on, it doesn't work. It seems I need to create the graph then switch DSP on.
Jamie
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list