[PD] call for testers for L2Ork iteration of pd-extended (based on 0.42.x branch)

[Jonathan Wilkes]

--- On Mon, 11/22/10, Ivica Ico Bukvic <ico at vt.edu> wrote:

> From: Ivica Ico Bukvic <ico at vt.edu>
> Subject: Re: [PD] call for testers for L2Ork iteration of pd-extended (based on 0.42.x branch)
> To: "Jonathan Wilkes" <jancsika at yahoo.com>
> Cc: pd-list at iem.at
> Date: Monday, November 22, 2010, 9:44 PM
> 
> > Attached is another example:
> > 1. Select all the [clip] objects.
> > 2. Move them so the [vsl] overlaps them.
> > 3. Right-click the bottom [clip] and choose "To
> front". It works as 
> > it should.
> > 4. Now, with all the [clip] objects still selected,
> right-click on 
> > the same bottom [clip] and choose "To back".  It
> deselects all the 
> > other clips and only moves the bottom [clip] to the
> back.  But 
> > shouldn't it instead move all the selected objects
> behind the 
> > [vsl]?
> 
> You are correct. Just fixed this bug, changed the edit menu
> ordering and
> included to front/back options, added key shortcuts, added
> tidy up
> shortcut and increased its threshold which IMHO makes it
> much more
> usable.

Regarding "tidy up"-- are you referring to XTOLERANCE, 
YTOLERANCE, and NHIST?  If so, I posted a message awhile back with 
what seemed like some decent values, but in some cases it would
swap the position of two objects in a row or column.  Also, this 
behavior changed depending on the order in which those objects were 
created.  (I have a feeling this is why those values are set so low.)

If you post another tar.gz with your new "tidy" I'll see 
if I can reproduce this behavior.

-Jonathan

> 
> HTH
> 
>