[PD] pd-pidip into Debian

Patrick Pagano pat at digitalworlds.ufl.edu
Tue Nov 23 21:27:30 CET 2010


removing pdp/pidip is a bad idea

On 11/23/2010 11:58 AM, John Harrison wrote:
> Yves:
>
> It's your code so you get to choose. From my standpoint as an 
> educator, removal of PiDiP from pd-extended is very unfortunate. I 
> hope at some point you reconsider your position.
>
> -John
>
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:46 AM, ydegoyon at gmail.com 
> <mailto:ydegoyon at gmail.com> <ydegoyon at gmail.com 
> <mailto:ydegoyon at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>     good!!! i'm free to do what i like now!!!
>
>     yeh!
>
>     sevy
>
>     Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
>
>         Ok, will do. I also have to remove pidip from Pd-extended
>         based on this license.
>
>         .hc
>
>         On Nov 23, 2010, at 7:18 AM, ydegoyon at free.fr
>         <mailto:ydegoyon at free.fr> wrote:
>
>             jooo, que espeso ...
>
>             i told you 10000 times not to package my stuff,
>             that i'm happy with the packages of goto10...
>
>             so [EOC]
>
>
>             ciao,
>             sevy
>
>
>             Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
>
>                 Hey Lluis and Yves,
>
>                 I see that puredyne has packaged pidip, so it should
>                 be pretty easy to get it into Debian. The only problem
>                 is the license. If it was a straight BSD or GPL
>                 license, then it would be fine. The problem is this line:
>
>                 NOT FOR MILITARY OR REPRESSIVE USE !!!
>
>                 That isn't free according to the Debian Free Software
>                 Guidelines.
>
>                 .hc
>
>                 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>                 As we enjoy great advantages from inventions of
>                 others, we should be glad of an opportunity to serve
>                 others by any invention of ours; and this we should do
>                 freely and generously. - Benjamin Franklin
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>         ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>         Programs should be written for people to read, and only
>         incidentally for machines to execute.
>         - from Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs
>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Pd-list at iem.at <mailto:Pd-list at iem.at> mailing list
>     UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>     http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20101123/6ed18b0f/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list