[PD] big soundfiles
Roman Haefeli
reduzent at gmail.com
Fri Nov 26 08:34:02 CET 2010
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 02:10 +0100, João Pais wrote:
> how about removing the expXXX numbers, and use only concrete floats?
?
Can you elaborate on this? What are 'expXXX' numbers and what are
'concrete floats'?
Anyway, I think the solution would be to use 64bit float as the index.
In 64-bit Pd, this isn't an issue anymore (or more correct: It will be
with _much_ larger tables).
Roman
> or is
> there any software reason that doesn't let that happen?
>
> > On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Derek Holzer wrote:
> >
> >> And keep in mind that sound quality goes down as file size goes up.
> >> This is because of the interpolation. You might do better cutting your
> >> file up and putting it into several different arrays.
> >
> > Oh, and isn't it the case that [tabread~] 0.42 has an extra inlet for
> > the purpose of getting more precision ? The read point is now relative
> > to a message-rate setting.
> >
> > If you have to play a very large file in RAM, you can do it by emptying
> > your signal-rate counter into a message-rate counter that takes care of
> > the big digits while the signal-rate counter keeps on taking care of the
> > small digits and fractions. (do you want an example ?)
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > | Mathieu Bouchard ------------------------------------- Aix-en-Provence
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list