[PD] big soundfiles
IOhannes m zmoelnig
zmoelnig at iem.at
Mon Nov 29 15:06:27 CET 2010
On 2010-11-29 14:45, tim vets wrote:
> do I interpret it correct if I assume that a solution for [tabread~]-ing big
> files without quality loss would be to make a counter and split one big
> [line~] movement into small segments ?
>
> something like:
>
> [metro 100]
> |
> [f]X[+ 4410]
> |
> [s adder]
>
> and
>
> [r adder]
> |
> [t b f]
> | |
> [0, 4410 100( |
> | /
> [line~] /
> | ______ /
> [+~]
???
you are still hitting the problem that the output of [+~] has probably
to little precision.
your patch will thus not give you any benefit.
> |
> [tabread~]
i was _not_ talking about [tabread~] but about [tabplay~]
[bang(
|
[tabplay~]
alternatively you can use the send inlet (message!) of [tabread4~] for
better precision. the help-patch directs you to B15.tabread4~-onset.pd
msdfrt#
IOhannes
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3636 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20101129/68e0e534/attachment.bin>
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list