[PD] new license for pidip and unauthorized WAS: pd-pidip into Debian

[Jose Luis Santorcuato]

Hi list!, PiDiP In my humble opinion is a great tool for video work, a
complement to or Gem or Gridflow and actually doing would be a shame
to stay out of pd extended.

I like the possibilities of interaction and partnership with OpenCV
... is a penalty if it is not in pd, but is also addressing the
problem of licenses.

Best regards

José


2010/12/7 Derek Holzer <derek at umatic.nl>:
> What is there exactly in PiDiP that people need so badly? The (IMHO ugly)
> video filters from EffecTV? Or the streaming part?
>
> In either case, the solution seems simple to me. PDP itself isn't really
> being maintained AFAIK, and isn't completely cross-platform anyways, so why
> not just implement what is needed from PiDiP in GEM?
>
> If there is a (willfully) stubborn stone in the river, just fork and move
> around it! And one less reason to put up with a certain person's
> temper-tantrums later...
>
> D.
>
> On 12/7/10 1:56 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
>> Currently pidip is in a state where the two licenses conflict
>> irreconcilably. So if you use pidip under Yves' license, you could be
>> sued by the EffecTV copyright holder. Or if you use it under the GPL
>> from EffecTV, you could be sued by the PiDiP copyright holder.
>
> --
> ::: derek holzer ::: http://macumbista.net :::
> ---Oblique Strategy # 131:
> "Question the heroic approach"
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>



-- 
http://arselectronicachile.blogspot.com
http://comunicacionnativa.blogspot.com/
http://www.myspace.com/santorcuato