[PD] gridflow 9.13 for windows?

patko colet.patrice at free.fr
Wed Feb 9 01:07:32 CET 2011


Why do we have to put dll into windows/system32 instead of pd/bin?

I don't like to move things to system32, this afternoon i had to fix a problem involved by a library sitting there.

----- "Mathieu Bouchard" <matju at artengine.ca> a écrit :

> On Wed, 8 Dec 2010, patko wrote:
> 
> > This should be gridflow 9.12, I didn't heard about a 9.13 version,
> also 
> > HC told me to put the link on puredata.info but I don't understand
> how 
> > this plone site is working, I can't post anything without getting 
> > errors.
> 
> Ok, I finally tagged GridFlow 9.13 and made a package :
> 
>    http://gridflow.ca/download/packages/gridflow-9.13-win32-i386.zip
> 
> Unlike GridFlow 9.12, which was built using gcc4, this is built with
> gcc3, 
> just like GridFlow 9.8 and 9.7, and hopefully, it will be the last one
> to 
> be built with gcc3.
> 
> Yes, my Windows partition is back, as mysteriously as it was gone.
> 
> If there's any reason why I should rebuild 9.13 with gcc4, I could be
> 
> doing it.
> 
> GEM support still doesn't work on win32, and according to Johannes,
> will 
> be hard to get to work.
> 
> I still haven't added X11 support in this build.
> 
> Can we make sure that it can be loaded by everybody, and [gf/gl]
> works ? 
> After that, I'll make an official announcement. (Well, when the other
> 
> packages are done as well)
> 
>  
> _______________________________________________________________________
> | Mathieu Bouchard ---- tél: +1.514.383.3801 ---- Villeray, Montréal,
> QC

-- 
Patrice Colet 



More information about the Pd-list mailing list