[PD] gem2pdp state (Gem compatibility)

Daniel Roviriego danifernando at gmail.com
Tue Apr 5 13:34:32 CEST 2011


Hi.

*did you compile gem2pdp against the new version of Gem?*

Yes, I did. Should I try a more recent than the 11th March, svn ?

Thanks a lot


2011/4/5 IOhannes zmölnig <zmoelnig at iem.at>

> On 04/05/2011 02:28 AM, Daniel Roviriego wrote:
>
>> Hi All..
>>
>> I have been using a very recent version of Gem (compiled: Mar 11 2011) for
>> the pix_record to v4l2loopback feature (thanks Iohannes, It's working
>> great!). But, the pdp2gem object is  not working at all, while pix_2pdp
>> works ok. (version "gem2pdp v0.7"). That's with pd vanilla (0.42-6)
>>
>
> did you compile gem2pdp against the new version of Gem?
>
> Gem has changed quite a lot in it's API, so things might have broken.
> the reason for the changes was, to allow for a more stable API in the
> future :-)
>
>
> gfamsdr
> IOhannes
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>



-- 
Daniel Roviriego
(21) 35920701
(16) 99645077
M2D Multimídia
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20110405/f1fb3713/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list