[PD] reorg of puredata.info/docs/developer

András Murányi muranyia at gmail.com
Wed Jul 6 18:22:06 CEST 2011


2011/7/6 Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans at at.or.at>

>
> On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 15:36 +0200, "András Murányi" <muranyia at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 00:12, Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans at at.or.at>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I should, there is a specific question of whether these two are still
> > > needed:
> > >
> > > http://puredata.info/docs/**developer/64BitLinux<
> http://puredata.info/docs/developer/64BitLinux>
> > >
> http://puredata.info/docs/**developer/**BuildingPdExtended64bitUbuntuI**
> > > ntrepid<
> http://puredata.info/docs/developer/BuildingPdExtended64bitUbuntuIntrepid>
> > >
> > > 0.43 should work fine on all 64-bit systems (never tested Windows tho).
> > >
> > > .hc
> > >
> >
> > Well, do these apply to to 0.42 in any way? If not any more, they can go.
> > However, it could be nice to have a short writeup on the history of
> > 64-bit
> > in Pd, most importantly stating the version from which it does not make a
> > difference any more.
> >
> > Andras
>
> That's a good idea.  As far as I know, Pd vanilla 0.42.5 was the first
> version that was fully usable on 64-bit.  Pd-extended 0.43 is the first
> version where the all the libs are expected to run on 64-bit (at least
> on GNU/Linux, still no Gem on Mac OS X).  Here's my quick stab at this
> page and I don't even have a 64-bit OS.  Can the 64-bit people add and
> edit this to something useful :-D
>
> http://puredata.info/docs/64BitSupport
>
> .hc
>

Cool! Now, I'd add some notes on the practical implications of this... what
about you moving the two previously mentioned pages under this new one
(sorry i'm not confident moving pages in the wiki... i've messed things up
before) and me adding the context?
(Also, someone could make this "an XXX bits float can store a YYY bits
integer" a bit more clear as I personally still don't really understand it.
I also remember vaguely some criticism of this system, that it is not very
efficient? Matju? If you guys explain it here on the list I'll be happy to
add it to the wiki.)

Andras
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20110706/7eaabf73/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pd-list mailing list