[PD] GUI and DSP

[Jonathan Wilkes]

Make sure you run the most recent version of pdl2ork when you fire it up next.

There have been a lot of speedups since then.

-Jonathan




>________________________________
> From: Billy Stiltner <billy.stiltner at gmail.com>
>To: Jonathan Wilkes <jancsika at yahoo.com> 
>Cc: pd-list <pd-list at iem.at> 
>Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 6:30 PM
>Subject: Re: [PD] GUI and DSP
> 
>
>I don't remember its been about a year or so since I ran it. Was the same thing that was slow with the other  slow versions of pd I guess.  Next time Ifire up the machine it's on I'll try to run it.  I remember that max with juce on windows would drop out with the x.fm patch if I played a bunch of notes.with a 256b block pd would drop out with polyphony as well but I could run with a 64b block and GEM slinging polygons all over the place but  the juce examples were slow. With a lot of overhead. I might not have had enough memory 1GB.
>
>
>
>On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Jonathan Wilkes <jancsika at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>________________________________
>>> From: Billy Stiltner <billy.stiltner at gmail.com>
>>>To: Mathieu Bouchard <matju at artengine.ca>
>>>Cc: Jonathan Wilkes <jancsika at yahoo.com>; "pd-list at iem.at List" <pd-list at iem.at>
>>>Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 4:03 AM
>>
>>>Subject: Re: [PD] GUI and DSP
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>>When I tried JUCE on windows it was slow. pretty but slow. Same with pdlork  on linux.
>>
>>What was slow with pd-l2ork?
>>
>>-Jonathan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20120212/36b3e22d/attachment.htm>