[PD] nonlocal message passing scope
Jonathan Wilkes
jancsika at yahoo.com
Wed Mar 7 07:10:28 CET 2012
>________________________________
> From: Billy Stiltner <billy.stiltner at gmail.com>
>To: Jonathan Wilkes <jancsika at yahoo.com>
>Cc: "pd-list at iem.at" <pd-list at iem.at>
>Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2012 12:19 AM
>Subject: Re: [PD] nonlocal message passing scope
>
>
>I don't know if making it easier to do would be good for learning but it sure would be easier for doing. haha!
Well, if you had abstraction wrappers for [s]/[r], [throw~]/[catch~], [s~]/[r~], [v], and dialog box entries for the
"Put" menu array and iemguis (and possibly canvas properties), you wouldn't have to bother with $0 as a user.
Plus a convenience abstraction to prefix a given symbol based on the scope you want, so that you can use it
as a send-symbol inside message boxes. I guess the sticking points are objects that take an array name as
an argument-- in the majority of cases those are settable, so I guess the user could choose between
loadbanging a symbol or just using $0-prefixes there.
There are probably other uses of $0 that I'm missing... [struct] names I guess, but there you're already
punished for using $0 since it makes it impossible to reload scalar state.
-Jonathan
>
>I try not to think about how that works. once I figured it out I wrote down what I learned and use it as a reference or I'll just go look in a patch that I have used in and duplicate.
>
>
>
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list