[PD] trying to track down a bug: Pd-extended 0.43-1 beta on Oneric 32 bit
johnharrisonwsu at gmail.com
Wed Apr 4 14:06:54 CEST 2012
I'll see if I can figure all that out and test this weekend... I assume
with git log it will be obvious what commit I need to cherry-pick.
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 2:08 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig at iem.at> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> On 2012-04-04 03:25, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> >> i have hopefully fixed that as well and committed it to Gem's git
> (committish 1458b4f8cf in the 0.93 branch, in case somebody wants to
> backport it)
> > John or IOhannes,
> > Please let me know when its in the 0.93 branch, and I'll include it in
> "committed it to Gem's git (committish 1458b4f8cf in the 0.93 branch)"
> it would be nice, if john could test it more directly, without having me
> fix the bug in Gem's master, then backport it to Gem's 0.93, then having
> hans backport the changes to Pd-extended, then wait for the nightly
> build and then report that it is not working...
> backporting from Gem's master to Gem's 0.93 is fairly trivial using
> git's cherry-pick. the rest is less fun and should probably only be done
> once the bug is really fixed.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Pd-list