[PD] why does PD round numbers? (in tables, in messageboxes, etc)
Charles Henry
czhenry at gmail.com
Tue Apr 10 23:26:55 CEST 2012
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 7:32 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig at iem.at> wrote:
> On 04/10/12 10:33, katja wrote:
>>
>> I mean to say that switching to any format other than decimal ASCII
>> would make it impossible for Pd to interpret patch files using the
>> current format.
>
>
> why?
I think that using any non-decimal ascii format would be bad for
backwards compatibility. You'd need to have a function that would be
able to distinguish the decimal numbers from old patches from the
newer format. For example, 9000 is both a decimal and hexadecimal
number--so then, you'd need identifiers to know which method to use.
It's not a very clear-cut tradeoff, to adopt anything other than
longer decimal ascii numbers. Things could get very complicated
trying to keep multiple formats alive--or they could be simple and
just use a lot more characters.
More information about the Pd-list
mailing list