[PD] Max's [rate~] implementation...

[Alexandros Drymonitis]

Don't think I really follow. Each [rate~] actually outputs a [phasor~] with
a different frequency (different frequency ratio), all driven by the same
[phasor~]. How can you send a value from one number box to all [phasor~]s?


On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans at at.or.at>wrote:

>
> Why not just use a phasor~ per rate~ and then have the frequency of all
> them controlled by the same number box?
>
> .hc
>
> On Dec 6, 2012, at 8:57 AM, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:
>
> copy this patch http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6P4Ezz9aWa8&feature=plcp
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Simon Iten <itensimon at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> What are you trying to accomplish?
>> On Dec 6, 2012 2:48 PM, "Alexandros Drymonitis" <adrcki at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> How can one implement Max's [rate~] in Pd? [rate~] takes a signal from a
>>> [phasor~] and according to its argument it scales the frequency (roughly
>>> speaking). So
>>>
>>> [phasor~ 1]
>>> |
>>> [rate~ 1.5]
>>>
>>> will actually give a [phasor~ 1.5]. I thought of [wrap] but that won't
>>> do the trick with non-integers.
>>> Any ideas?
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>>
>>>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list at iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/attachments/20121206/230f5337/attachment.htm>